The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) reviews a variety of documents related to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 54 U.S.C. 306108 (formerly 16 U.S.C. 470), and the Arizona State Historic Preservation Act (SHPA), A.R.S. § 41-861 et seq. In order to better facilitate historic preservation compliance reviews, the SHPO Survey Report Standards, the Survey Review Summary Form (SRSF), and Guidance Point No. 10 are newly updated. These documentation standards - for use by agencies, local municipal governments, and private consulting firms - are based in part on guidance provided within the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation publications and policies, 36 C.F.R. §800.11, National Register Bulletins, SHPO guidance on implementing the SHPA, and Arizona State Museum (ASM) rules for implementing the Arizona Antiquities Act, A.R.S. §41-841 et seq.
For a summary of the changes, please refer to SHPO Guidance - What’s New in 2016. If you have any other questions, please contact the SHPO Archaeological Compliance staff; the staff directory can be found at Here.
SHPO Guidance - What's new in 2016 ( 540 KB PDF)
SHPO Survey Report Standards - 2016 ( 15 MB PDF)
SHPO Guidance Point No. 10 - 2016 ( 380 KB PDF)
SHPO FAQ 2016 ( 81 KB PDF)
SHPO Survey Report Summary Form - 2016( 40 KB PDF)
SHPO Survey Report Abstract Form - 2016 ( 63 KB PDF)
Through the Review and Compliance program, the SHPO assists federal, state, and local agencies in meeting their preservation responsibilities as defined by federal and state laws. The SHPO cooperates with the national Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to ensure that significant properties are taken into consideration at an early stage in federal project planning.
The SHPO staff provides technical assistance through accessing state resource inventory files; reviewing federal, state, county, and city projects to determine their possible impacts on cultural resources; explaining state and federal compliance procedures; ensuring application of professional standards; and providing opinions on the National Register eligibility of resources. For further information, call Ann Howard or David Jacobs at (602) 542-4009.
SHPO Guidance Point Series: The State Historic Preservation Office’s Guidance Point Series (Series) provide a means for meeting goals and objectives in the State Historic Preservation Office’s (SHPO) State Plan (Plan), which was updated in 2009.
According to three of the Plan’s goals (i.e., Goals 6, 7, & 8), SHPO should foster a constituency in Arizona that is informed and supportive of historic preservation issues. One of the goals targets the public, anther focuses on policy makers, and the third one identifies historic preservation professionals. Specific objectives in the Plan that the Series addresses include updating and broadening information available to the public, enabling citizens to make informed decisions on current historic preservation issues, and advising professionals on “best practices” for the treatment of historic properties.
SHPO Guidance Points assist agency and tribal officials, professionals, and members of the public to consult effectively, to select best practices for identifying, evaluating, and treating historic properties, and to make informed decisions about historic preservation. The Guidance Points are especially useful for consultants and applicants working at behest of state and federal agencies complying with historic preservation laws. The Series, which began in 2000, shares the SHPO staff’s research and experience on historic preservation issues in Arizona with audiences identified in the State Plan.
Topics are usually chosen for the Series that are related to recent preservation issues or project-specific solutions that the SHPO staff identifies as having broader appeal or application. At present, the series includes papers stressing the importance of Agency officials determining the eligibility of a property in terms of the State or National Registers of Historic Places’ criteria, describing different types of archaeological testing and their appropriate roles, guiding the use of mechanical boring under historic properties, evaluating the continued adequacy and accuracy of old survey data, understanding when site burial as a mitigation measure is appropriate, deciding when surface artifact collection during survey is not an adverse effect, guiding mitigation programs within linear rights-of-way, and conducting meaningful and effective tribal consultation for state and federal undertakings.
SHPO staff is always willing to entertain ideas for new topics that can be addressed in a Guidance Point. Feel free to contact SHPO staff with your ideas.
Presented as part of the 2016 Historic Preservation Conference, a special training workshop was presented by SHPO on “Archaeological and Historical Compliance in Arizona: Requirements of the State Historic Preservation Act and the Arizona Antiquities Act,” explaining how Arizona’s historic preservation laws can and should be an integral part of conducting business on state, county, municipal, and private lands.
Below are downloadable PDF documents of the Powerpoint presentations from the workshop.
1. State Historic Preservation Legislation and the State Historic Preservation Act - A.R.S. § 41-861 ( 3.5 MB PDF)
2. Agency Programs and the Arizona Register of Historic Places - A.R.S. § 41-862 & 41-863 ( 3.8 MB PDF)
3. SHPO Review of State Agency Plans - A.R.S. § 41-864 ( 423 KB PDF)
4. SHPO’s Guidance on Tribal Consultation for State Agencies ( 2.5 MB PDF
Arizona State Statutes §41-861 through §41-864 direct state agencies to: preserve historic properties under their ownership or control; consider the use of historic properties for agency responsibilities; establish a program to locate, inventory, and nominate properties to the Arizona Register of Historic Places; insure that properties are not destroyed or substantially altered by state action or assistance; make appropriate documentation in accordance with State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) standards if a property is destroyed or altered; and seek review and comment from the SHPO on agency plans. This report provides a summary of the performance of state agencies in compliance with these state statutes. The information provided was compiled from SHPO records and an agency self-evaluation questionnaire
SHPO FY 2015-16 Report on State Agency Compliance
SHPO FY 2013-14 Report on State Agency Compliance